🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, states are pouring enormous sums into the concept of “sovereign AI” – developing national AI systems. Starting with the city-state of Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, nations are racing to build AI that grasps local languages and cultural nuances.

The Worldwide AI Competition

This trend is part of a broader international contest spearheaded by tech giants from the United States and the People's Republic of China. Whereas organizations like OpenAI and Meta allocate massive funds, mid-sized nations are also taking sovereign gambles in the AI field.

But given such tremendous sums involved, can smaller states secure meaningful gains? As noted by a analyst from an influential research institute, If not you’re a affluent state or a large company, it’s a substantial burden to build an LLM from nothing.”

National Security Considerations

Many states are reluctant to depend on foreign AI systems. In India, for example, Western-developed AI systems have at times been insufficient. One instance saw an AI tool deployed to instruct learners in a distant village – it communicated in the English language with a thick American accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for regional listeners.

Then there’s the state security factor. For the Indian defence ministry, employing certain foreign systems is seen as unacceptable. As one entrepreneur explained, There might be some random learning material that may state that, oh, Ladakh is separate from India … Employing that certain AI in a defence setup is a big no-no.”

He further stated, “I have spoken to experts who are in the military. They aim to use AI, but, setting aside certain models, they don’t even want to rely on American systems because details could travel abroad, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

Homegrown Initiatives

Consequently, several nations are supporting national projects. An example such initiative is underway in the Indian market, where a company is striving to create a sovereign LLM with state funding. This effort has committed about a substantial sum to machine learning progress.

The developer envisions a model that is more compact than top-tier tools from American and Asian tech companies. He states that the nation will have to make up for the financial disparity with skill. “Being in India, we do not possess the luxury of pouring billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we compete with for example the hundreds of billions that the US is devoting? I think that is the point at which the core expertise and the intellectual challenge is essential.”

Local Priority

Throughout the city-state, a government initiative is backing AI systems educated in south-east Asia’s native tongues. These languages – such as the Malay language, Thai, Lao, Indonesian, Khmer and more – are often underrepresented in US and Chinese LLMs.

I wish the experts who are building these independent AI tools were aware of the extent to which and just how fast the leading edge is advancing.

A leader involved in the initiative says that these models are intended to complement bigger systems, rather than substituting them. Systems such as a popular AI tool and another major AI system, he states, often struggle with native tongues and cultural aspects – communicating in stilted the Khmer language, for instance, or proposing pork-based recipes to Malaysian consumers.

Developing regional-language LLMs permits national authorities to incorporate cultural sensitivity – and at least be “informed users” of a powerful technology developed in other countries.

He further explains, I am prudent with the concept sovereign. I think what we’re attempting to express is we aim to be more accurately reflected and we wish to comprehend the abilities” of AI systems.

International Collaboration

For nations seeking to find their place in an escalating global market, there’s a different approach: collaborate. Experts connected to a well-known institution recently proposed a government-backed AI initiative shared among a alliance of developing nations.

They term the project “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, drawing inspiration from the European successful initiative to build a alternative to a major aerospace firm in the 1960s. Their proposal would involve the establishment of a government-supported AI organization that would pool the capabilities of various countries’ AI initiatives – such as the UK, Spain, Canada, Germany, Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, France, the Swiss Confederation and Sweden – to establish a viable alternative to the US and Chinese giants.

The lead author of a report outlining the proposal states that the idea has drawn the consideration of AI ministers of at least several nations so far, in addition to a number of national AI companies. Although it is currently focused on “middle powers”, emerging economies – the nation of Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda for example – have also shown curiosity.

He comments, “Nowadays, I think it’s just a fact there’s less trust in the promises of the existing US administration. People are asking like, is it safe to rely on any of this tech? In case they decide to